nimo23
nimo23
Replaced by https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/pull/1281
>I know that CachedIndicator does not cache last bar, but it is simply inefficient..Do you use that last bar for standard indicator calculations, or some special rules that do not...
My thoughts on the origin request: https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/issues/1211#issue-2625950007: >Bar Creation with End Time: Already handled in https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/issues/1213. >Bar Duration in Each Bar Object: Including duration within each Bar object seems redundant...
After this is merged, I will create a new PR to resolve https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/issues/1229.
Check `org.ta4j.core.rules.ChainRule` with its `org.ta4j.core.rules.helper.ChainLink`.
I think, you can extend `CrossedUpIndicatorRule` and `CrossedDownIndicatorRule` with an optional constructor parameter, e.g. `requiredNumberOfBars: the minimum number of bars that must remain to fulfill the rule` @francescopeloi do you...
>Yes. I spent some time thinking if this can be generalised to something more generic, as it feels it could be a requirement for more than just CrossedUp/Down. Yes definitely.
@francescopeloi See https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/blob/0400fd9d4f8133a345c5f2832802d5f7f2b4df0d/ta4j-core/src/test/java/org/ta4j/core/rules/ChainRuleTest.java#L124 to see how your use case can be implemented.
Will `kubb/mcp` be able to generate MCP server definitions from OpenAPI?
>Are you interested in a contribution? To contribute, I have to learn how to do it, which I unfortunately don't have time for. If you hire me, I would be...