Nik Revenco
Nik Revenco
> A heads up that the merge has wiped out your original doc file, so you'll want to restore it but under the TOP009 name of course Thankfully we have...
> Question - my understanding from the original issue was that this rule was meant to **prevent** LO items being questions, as they instead should be statements of what the...
Actually, seems like there are still some mistakes. Sorry let me test it a bit more.
> Question - my understanding from the original issue was that this rule was meant to **prevent** LO items being questions, as they instead should be statements of what the...
For the changes that would be better made on my computer than via the github online editor, I'll add them in a few weeks time since I have exams at...
Not sure what's going on here, I've removed the comment but that didn't seem to work  used to work just fine before
@MaoShizhong Thank you! The PR is not ready for review yet as the tests are not passing. I will let you know when they are.
> Had a think about this further. > > I think we should add a non-script-fixable error if an LO item ends with a `?` that reports something like "Lesson...
> I think I'm with you on that, where the nuances and complexity of a fixer catching all cases isn't really that beneficial given the example you provided. > >...
Ready for review!