Nick Murphy

@SnoozeThis wait until Oct 8th 2024 -> assign to @namurphy, /retest, remove label "status: on hold"

As I mentioned earlier, this sounds good to me. As I didn't mention earlier, I always appreciate GitHub issues that can be sung to the theme song of Teenage Mutant...

Looking back at the discussion in #116, I'm wondering if it would be better to put these lists in PlasmaPy's documentation itself, rather than on the PlasmaPy project webpage. We...

Two more thoughts: - This task would probably work well in conjunction with coding up a spectral/finite element solver, since there are several papers that describe spectral/finite element Grad-Shafranov solvers....

I ran the full test suite locally on my workstation with `nox -s 'tests-all(3.12)'` for both the `main` and `denumbafy` branches (with and without Numba, respectively). The overall test suite...

I did some timings to check the performance of jitted and non-jitted versions of `plasma_frequency_lite`. The relative differences in performance are high, but the absolute differences remain quite low. |...

> Alas, so it is. Perhaps Numba's still better for end users instead of libraries 🫡 It really is! Numba is a fantastic package, but the ∼3–5 month delays after...

Awesome, thank you! I'll go ahead and merge it. I suspect this will make @wtbarnes happy. 🙃

For this, we could potentially make use of [`pytest-freethreaded`](https://github.com/tonybaloney/pytest-freethreaded) (which I learned about on the Python Bytes podcast from Oct 7).

Tentatively closing this for since we're consolidating some of the workflows while making the switch from tox to Nox. We could also look into [OpenAstronomy/github-actions-workflows](https://github.com/OpenAstronomy/github-actions-workflows).