Nick Murphy

Thank you for raising this issue! I've usually changed this example to something like `distance_in_kilometers` and `distance_in_miles` in sessions with lots of physicists, primarily because the distinction between mass and...

I don't know of any simulation codes that make extensive use of the community feature on Zenodo, but here are a few peripheral examples that might give a better idea...

> Context: I have been trying for a while to improve the documentation of ArviZ and PyMC libraries and trying to follow numpydoc and rest of conventions used in the...

Cool! I just edited this to include positional-only parameters also, which I had forgotten about because the main project I'm working on is currently Python 3.7+, and this capability was...

I was thinking that "keyword-only" and "positional-only" should be treated the same as "optional", since they're used in the same place for similar reasons. I took a look at the...

> In principle it'd be nice to add related checks to the docstring validation as well, to help codify the updates to the standard. That's an interesting thought! I'd really...

Just to follow up on this since it's been a few months, is there a timeline for deciding on this? Thanks!

@rossbar — please feel free to! Since you're not sure about the timeline, would it make sense to have the validation be in a separate pull request? "Keyword-only" and "optional"...

Thank you for the review!

@MKastek — please go for it, and thank you!