Pablo Baeyens
Pablo Baeyens
This mostly works but I would need #13064 to avoid some quirks with expanded values
@bogdandrutu we can merge this once the conflicts are resolved
@echlebek The section that should reflect the current state is the "Desired behavior" section. The `$FOO` syntax was indeed deprecated (since accidental uses of it such as in passwords/keys caused...
@echlebek Any documentation about this should be in opentelemetry.io, not here. We can add a disclaimer to RFCs saying that they are design documents and that they do not necessarily...
@jsoriano Can you request another review from me (with the :repeat: button) once this is ready for another look?
@jsoriano Happy to reopen this if you come back to it at some point :)
Since this was specially controversial last time, I suggest we wait either until we have more approvals (I suggest 4) or some time has passed (I would suggest Friday next...
Converting to draft until we hear back about https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/pull/13041#discussion_r2109449661
I added project-infra to this, even though the label description says that this is for 'non-Github' issues only. @trask do you think there is a better area label for this?
From triage session on 2025-04-07 this is related to #2535 (probably a sub-issue of this?). Since the parent issue needs a sponsor, we are labeling this one in the same...