Murisi Tarusenga
Murisi Tarusenga
pls update wasm
> @murisi do you know how long this will take? any chance you could do it quickly? I expect this to take maybe 2 or 3 days. I'd already started...
> what's the status of this? Is it still desired or necessary? It may be necessary. I'll be looking at integrating it soon.
> looks good Does it have anything to do with #77? If we have this PR, do we still need to expose the randomness since we can get them from...
> Are these problems? I was under the impression that these changes made it closer to anoma/namada. They might be problems. In `anoma/namada`, if Bertha was sending 5BTC to a...
> @murisi Is this expected / do you expect your WIP changes to address this? I suspect that this issue is due to Namada v0.33.0 not being supported by the...
@dan-u410 Thanks for your report. I just realized that you're using Namada Ledger App version 0.0.16. Please try using Namada Ledger App version 0.0.18 ( https://github.com/Zondax/ledger-namada/releases/tag/v0.0.18 ) or later.
Hi @dan-u410 . Thanks for the heads up. The transaction format for Transfers changed in #3356 and also #3459 . So we've decided to publish to the ledger live store...
> What is reasoning behind allowing users to spend assets not in the current epoch? Hi! The reasoning is as follows: MASP conversions are discrete in the sense that for...
> Also, shouldn't we have such cases in the integration tests? I believe the integration tests are already implicitly using notes from older epochs. But you're right, I will try...