Montana
Montana
Converting to discussion until we resolve GSC methods
Thanks @cmungall !! I don't know why I left it as draft... & the TWG call hasn't happened since early April, so maybe I was waiting for exactly that!!
Discuss with CIG IF there is need for HCR extensions to specify the tot_c content of the WATER vs the sample, we should update the description to emphasize that the...
Thanks @lschriml I realized that from a comment from @cmungall With that, I agree we could probably close this PR and issue, but we should visit the included discussion to...
Blocked by https://github.com/GenomicsStandardsConsortium/mixs/pull/805
To discuss at TWG: deprecation protocol in place. However, policy should still be discussed & by that I mean I have tagged these to be deprecated but I'm not sure...
@lschriml In the issue linked above. https://github.com/GenomicsStandardsConsortium/mixs/issues/696, and @only1chunts comment https://github.com/GenomicsStandardsConsortium/mixs/issues/696#issuecomment-1790283905 The FAO permissible values have changes & the previously provided link is no longer active. So I updated the...
> I don't know what the MIxS policy is on removing permissible values - these may have been used in existing projects. > > I would instead mark these as...
Additional note based on todays discussion, the current deprecation method doesn't not have a way to capture JUST the permissible values within an enum. A LinkML update will be needed...
Very old PR. Should we merge main and merge this? @turbomam @pbuttigieg