Montana

Corrected with PR https://github.com/GenomicsStandardsConsortium/mixs/pull/825

see https://github.com/GenomicsStandardsConsortium/mixs/issues/566 https://github.com/GenomicsStandardsConsortium/mixs/issues/699 https://github.com/GenomicsStandardsConsortium/mixs/issues/566

@lschriml are you concerned that there's just a misunderstanding of how to use the slots, and not a mistake in the descriptions? I did recently submit a PR to make...

@cpavloud I tried to tag you in a comment in my PR, but your username wasn't showing up. I'll try again. But once we hear back from Pelin & get...

@only1chunts @lschriml Any word from Pelin or the board?

OK, we're approaching a month since we started this discussion. At what point do we consider the new community feedback, that these term descriptions are backwards and confusing the current...

For what it's worth, I just looked at v5 and v4. v4 doesn't have these terms & v5 has them incorrect as well.

Move forward with the change. Capture notes and comments about why and provide VERY clear and well described notes.

See https://www.gensc.org/pages/standards/checklists.html#:~:text=Missing%20value%20reporting,remove%20mandatory%20terms!). Terms to add need reviewed as some don't exactly match INSDC - https://www.insdc.org/submitting-standards/missing-value-reporting/ Need to check with @Woolly-at-EBI about the terms as it's inconsistent in insdc documentation. not...

`not applicable` is allowed along, no additional information Is 'missing' allowed on its own? From what Peter provided, would the MissingValueEnum really be - not applicable - not collected -...