Sean Gilligan

> However, the plugin doesn't allow you to declare more than one "configuration" atm and we would want to change this in the future. Yes, this is essentially what I...

@abhinayagarwal I'd like to declare something like this: ``` javafx { version = '15' modules = [ 'javafx.graphics', 'javafx.fxml' ] configurations = ['api', 'testImplementation'] } ``` Which would effectively generate...

@abhinayagarwal @jperedadnr Are there any updates on support for a second `configuration`, such as `testCompile` or `testImplementation` ? I had a workaround solution for this issue, but upgrading to OpenJFX...

@abhinayagarwal JavaFX 17.0.0.1 allows me to use my workaround to this issue (i.e. not using the Gradle plugin at all) but this improvement is still needed for JavaFX library developers...

PR #115 looks like it might be a solution for this problem.

PR #115 looks like it might be a solution for this problem.

@abhinayagarwal You should be able to use the Gradle `exclude` method nested below the `compile` method that declares the `controlsfx` dependency.

I use `openjfx/javafx-gradle-plugin` with https://github.com/beryx/badass-jlink-plugin/ regularly and they work well together. I would recommend closing this issue and perhaps adding something in the README referring to https://github.com/beryx/badass-jlink-plugin/.

Well there certainly isn't "strong" cryptographic integrity and [this](https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/blob/e2e5f0e258ae7f381f954d284b69e90369328f52/app/views/about/_data_assurance.html.erb) is clearly wrong: The data model that Git uses ensures the cryptographic integrity of every bit of your project. Every file...

From [JEP 264](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/264) > Non-Goals > > * It is not a goal to define a general-purpose interface for logging. The service interface contains only the minimal set of methods...