Sean Gilligan

The newer dependencies have better module support, so they will also be useful in apps built using `jlink`, etc.

I'm seeing something similar. @liubinduo Are you running a modular application?

BridJ is looking like it is unmaintained. Are there any plans to migrate to something newer or that is maintained?

So, to be clear Java 9+ will work if webcam-capture is loaded on the classpath. (At least that what I'm seeing in my basic testing.) This issue is about library...

So, unmerged [BridJ PR #103](https://github.com/nativelibs4java/BridJ/pull/103) seems to fix the problem for me. I [forked BridJ](https://github.com/msgilligan/BridJ) and created a https://jitpack.io build using the `msgilligan-master` branch. I have successfully used to build...

@sarxos -- let's make a fork/release of the patch to **BridJ**! Are you game?

OK, I've created a fork of **BridJ** in the **ConsensusJ** organization: https://github.com/ConsensusJ/BridJ This (in the `consensusj-master` branch) has PR #103 and also pulls in essential build configuration from what was...

This is (at least tangentially) related to Issue #1008.

Thanks @Vampire! (Adding the `spock-junit4` artifact fixed my problem) Two suggestions: 1. We add a section to the 2.0 manual for upgrading from Spock 1.3 that suggests adding this dependency...

(for that matter it might be nice to have a landing page somewhere with links to the various versions of the manual)