Martin Raspaud
Martin Raspaud
@volkist that sounds like a good idea. Anything you can work on?
I think that's a good idea, and I like the addendum by @gerritholl also. So please go ahead :)
so in that code snippet above, we should replace `str(self)` with `repr(self)`, right?
shouldn't we change `__str__` rather than `__repr__`? I think str should be more user friendly, while repr is more for serializing
from what I see SNAP seems to be filtering noise out. We have this capability in satpy now also I think, but can you get a hold of exactly what...
@system123 interesting, thanks a lot for digging into this! Do I understand correctly then that the mask in satpy and Snap are different then?
Thanks a lot for sorting out the flag issues! Regarding the reflectance difference, snap must be doing something to the data. I the satpy reader, we are not touching level...
Thing is I don't know how we would do composites with channels from both instruments...
we could make a oli/tirs instrument... about the name, I just wrote whatever came through my head at the time, no strong opinions at all. This was put up very...
I'm not against having an example using basemap as long as it is clearly stated that it's for legacy installations only. @guidocioni feel free to open a PR :)