mark padgham

That's great @cforgaci, and thanks for responding so promptly. Can you may rearrange the sentence, especially to avoid starting with a negative implication, "aren't worth documenting ...". I think it...

@maelle I've approved here -feel free to suggest any additional tweaks, otherwise please merge :heavy_check_mark:

Thanks for the ping @maurolepore - I'll endeavour to get this moving again, and will get back to asap

> @mpadge I had to create a linear history to be able to use `babeldown::deepl_branch_update()`. Wow, cool, thanks for doing that work! > What about #845 https://github.com/ropensci/dev_guide/issues/845#issuecomment-3631396985 - input there...

@HarryRobertsITS Interesting proposition. That's fairly easy to implement as a separate function to update "standard" component vectors: ``` r library (dodgr) packageVersion ("dodgr") #> [1] '0.4.3.14' bb

@HarryRobertsITS Thanks for the example code. I won't have time to dive in to this for a while, but a superficial scan of your code suggests to me that the...

@HarryRobertsITS Yeah, you're right there - the hacky code I put in just artificially disconnects components, when in reality many should remain connected through alternative ways beyond the one way...

@maelle FYI The "non-API calls" are definitely an issue from cpp11, and must be resolved there. It's affecting a lot of packages now. [PR to fix](https://github.com/r-lib/cpp11/pull/358) has been open for...

Thanks so much @harrysroberts , this looks great. I'll be back in my office next week, and will give it a run then. Just one comment in the meantime: Lots...

@harrysroberts Checks are failing because you need to update the docs with the new `strong` parameter. Just `make doc` in this directory, or `devtools::document()` in an R session.