mark padgham

@mccroweyclinton-EPA Seems that [your test coverage workflows](https://github.com/USEPA/RAQSAPI/actions/workflows/test-coverage.yaml) have not yet passed at all. They provide a solid benchmark, as they are run in entirely independent machines which you must explicitly...

To reiterate: > You first need to get your test-coverage action working on GitHub. It's not fixed if that's not working. You'll need to first get it working here, then...

@mccroweyclinton-EPA Intermittent failures almost always reflect some local quirks of your own setup. A first step should be to try to setup a more repeatable and robust environment. My general...

https://ropensci.org/blog/2024/02/06/verbosity-control-packages/ gives a good starter point for that.

@maelle I don't think that "easy to install" is too important here, as most package authors can and do choose from {datasets}. I think the only real issue is that...

Thanks @antaldaniel for your willingness to reconsider, which is indeed what we intend to request in the review thread. We also do not intend to muddy that issue with debates...

Thanks @atsyplenkov for your inquiry here. My first impressions are that the package seems like a good fit here indeed! Short responses to your specific questions: > 1. I raised...

Thanks @atsyplenkov, i'll put this issue on hold for the moment then. That just means the bot will add a "holding" label to this issue, which we can remove once...

@ropensci-review-bot put on hold

@atsyplenkov Thanks for volunteering to review #718, and by pure coincidence the bot reminder just auto-popped up here. Do you have any updates on the status of this submission?