mark padgham

Thanks heaps @dcooley, and yeah, I'd agree with your suggestion for how to do this: You fork my fork, PR to that, we back-and-forth with @joelgombin, and he approves final...

@dcooley done most `./inst` stuff now - thanks for the example of your fine `decido` work - excellent templating there! Speaking of which ... that's the one thing yet to...

Nice work @moodymudskipper, and just a note that this is all possible, illustrated via [`pkgstats` package](https://github.com/ropenscilabs/pkgstats): ``` r library (pkgstats) tarball

Sounds good, let's go for it. It should be pretty straightforward to just add a new entry to `gender(... method = )` and go from there. That would minimally just...

Lincoln, just checking one further issue with you: The gender library returns only identified gender, so most columns of current return object from your `gender()` function will simply be empty...

2nd Q first: Yes, that should be possible, and would be a much better idea. It'll still have to go in `inst`, because it has to be packaged precisely as...

Thanks @smnnlt , we've recently added an ability for submitting authors to directly call ˋ@ropensci-review-bot check packageˋ. Feel free to give that a try, to re-run the checks. (You'd get...

> Adding an user agent. Should that user agent be different for package developers themselves and for CI. This is all very much "in flux". I think use of http2...

I agree with the suggestions of @ewallace that pinging @ropensci/staff or the likes would be a good idea, and that definitely should be listed somewhere. Or maybe even @ropensci/help might...

@christophsax Sorry about the mess up here - the checks server is currently running R4.0.3, so doesn't recognise native pipes which you use in some test code. Will upgrade asap...