mark padgham

Yeah, sorry for lack of progress here @marcburri - seems like you're still waiting for review from @CompBioDan. @rkillick Any updates from your side?

@rmgpanw You've used the pre-submission template here, instead of the one for full submissions. Can you please: 1. click "New Issue" -> "Submit software for review" and copy the templated...

Thanks for submitting @rmgpanw, and great to see that you've got the tests working. I note only one aspect of the {pkgcheck} results here: > This package features some noteworthy...

@ropensci-review-bot assign @emilyriederer as editor

@pachadotdev and @emilyriederer Sorry for any inconvenience caused by these errors. Our check system hasn't yet been properly configured to handle packages in sub-directories. I'll let you know here when...

@pachadotdev @litalbarkai [This StackOverflow chunk](https://stackoverflow.com/a/10548919) can be used to merge two repos. I just tried it for your repos, and everything worked perfectly. You can also easily transfer issues across,...

Thanks for the ping @Robinlovelace. There are two distinct issues here: 1. _Turn restrictions_ which are purely spatial, and could indeed be implemented along the lines that @idshklein suggested above....

@beatrizmilz @ahasverus I don't know why the `check package` results didn't appear there. The logs seems to indicate a glitch with the GitHub cli. I'll re-trigger them manually ...

(Note also that the check for default "master" branch has been implemented since the previous checks were issues; this should be addressed. We're working on updating [our Dev Guide to...

@edzer Yes indeed. I'll ping you back here when that's done.