Mark Nottingham
Mark Nottingham
No worries. Those names are better, FWIW.
That registry is the media type registry - each media type definition needs to define its semantics under applicable methods.
The registry refers to the specification which does have that information. I don't think it can be left to the servers -- where's the interop?
+1 - this is different to PATCH, where we want generic software to process the content; it's more closely coupled because the resource defines the interface. I think this can...
... and to address the specific issue here: I agree the closest analogy is POST. There, it's often resource-specific semantics (i.e., tightly coupled) but the server can choose to use...
@tobie it's not just about voting powers, it's ability to influence discussion. It's well recognised that the AC has a few long-term participants who make most of the noise, and...
I'd start with an e-mail to [email protected] (per https://trustee.ietf.org).
That draft is expired; it was incorporated into RFC9111.
@nicowilliams it would be helpful to understand the motivation for the change. Pointing to a huge HN thread requires the reader to do an unreasonable amount of work - can...