Mark Nottingham
Mark Nottingham
I realised that after filing. {: brackets="angle"} does indeed work (thanks!); I'm just wondering if the default should be do to that, since that's what the RPC will do.
I make no comment as to the accuracy of that (unpublished) text.
+1. Also, `Integrity` is a bad name for this; it doesn't describe what the header is. Something like `Signature` is more appropriate. The tricky part of this is describing *what*...
Canonicalisation is the big concern. Sometimes people don't have access to the exact bytes of their headers, sometimes implementations try to be "helpful", and sometimes middle boxes do things. Also,...
@mikewest I'd say that there's been long-term interest in having some sort of signature mechanism for HTTP, but it's never been quite enough to get us a standard. It looks...
`comp-dict` maybe?
Http 1.1 features are not necessarily prohibited from use in 1.0; see eg cache-control. Sent from my iPhone > On 10 May 2022, at 9:43 am, Adam Rice ***@***.***> wrote:...
I'm excited to see the W3C paying attention to this topic. FYI, we're starting a similar discussion in the IETF [here](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-where-does-that-come-from-00.html). One of the lenses that I'd encourage people to...
@plehegar has there been any progress on this work? If we have proposals for the presentation of CG reports, etc., where should we post those issues?
See: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5785 Basically, fill out the template included there and send it to [email protected] to ask for a registration.