Mircea Nistor

> It would be ideal if we can pass the key type as an option for this implementation and also override how the specific portion for the key identifier is...

relates to #605

removing this from milestone v4 since it can be done as a feature release, without a breaking change

Thank you for reporting this! Do you also wish to contribute a fix?

Thanks for taking the time to post it! The problem that needs to be solved there is that verification failures for legitimate reasons and ones for exceptional situations are treated...

You are right, a simple boolean result for legitimate failures is not enough. Likely a result object with some details is necessary. There's a target API we're aiming for regarding...

> @mirceanis Thanks for clarifying the approach further. Just wanted to ask since I was going through the codebase more in-depth. The verify methods have a dependency upon `did-jwt` and...

That is wonderful news, and the implementation looks nice. Let us know how we can help. I see you are defining. Some key relationships when importing them. We were thinking...

> @mirceanis I was wondering whether you'd prefer if I create a `IVerifyResponse` as a type in Veramo core which will have a general `verified` and `error` fields. This can...

Actually the idea is that the plugin implementing the manager interface is the higher level plugin, that manages multiple other credential-status driver implementations