Michał Woźniak
Michał Woźniak
+1, thanks for raising this. Given we are just a month away from the planned 0.9 release it is unlikely to be included, as it would increase the risk of...
I make the following changes: - moved https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kueue/issues/2724 and https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kueue/issues/1353 to must haves (based on the user requests we get) - moved https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kueue/issues/3094 as nice to have (but still high...
FYI: opened the issue to track the release: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kueue/issues/3302. For now, we have the release candidate, please test, report issues and propose fixes :)
Since the test is removed I suggest closing it as obsolete. /close
@xmolitann would you like / find time to address the comments and complete the review?
> I guess that this unintended description was brought by this: Yeah, not sure we can express more sophisticated checks in kubebuilder. Maybe we should have a dedicated field in...
I see, but in the core k8s we can define printers which output the column based on custom logic in Go -not sure this is feasible with subprojects. As an...
This seems reasonable, but I no have double thoughts why / if we need the standalone annotation. Cause, I think the integration, when `inTreeAutoScaler` is on, would be essentially workload...