Michael Kochell
Michael Kochell
@TeodorPt Please avoid force-pushing, as GitHub makes it difficult to keep track of changes over time when this happens. Personally, I like deterministically seeing the diff between reviews. Unfortunately when...
@TeodorPt Also, if you'd like to have me re-review after changes have been addressed, please explicitly re-request review via GitHub's request feature
> there is no way of me knowing that the previous commits do not have other changes in them. > I agree, I didn't change anything though. @TeodorPt This is...
@dipak-demansol This is ready for QA review
@dipak-demansol Please prioritize this review if you can
Let's move the `features` argument to a flag argument instead of a positional, to properly treat it as an optional argument among the other optional arguments. `features` should be the...
@DHaussermann After looking at the changes from last QA review from Dipak, there are no significant changes, so I think this is good to merge
@DHaussermann I think this issue needs to have some UX discussion, as this point is a bit subjective: > **Expected**: @mentions should supersede mute logic and user should receive a...
@sanjaydemansol Would you like to review this? It looks like you self-requested your review and then cancelled it
> I am the author of this commit/branch. I assigned myself to subscribe for notifications on the same. But later thought, adding myself as **Assignee** is better. That's a bit...