Michael Bromley
Michael Bromley
Very good improvement, thank you!
We discussed this PR further, including your most recent comments @sgarner in the bi-weekly maintainer meeting today. Here's a summary: - This PR is addressing a huge problem that is...
Thank you for the detailed write-up and the fix! And also for your patience because it took me a while to get around to this :D
Yes, I'd be happy to merge a PR that changes the private methods to protected if that makes it more flexible.
Hey! It took me a while to get around to this but yes, this is a very good suggestion.
This is proving much more difficult to implement correctly than I had imagined. I spent a couple of hours trying to debug the problems but I'm not there yet. The...
Moved to the v3.2 milestone because more time is needed to resolve the issues in the WIP branch.
This looks good. One thing I'm wondering is whether we can move the node version matrix up to the top level to avoid repeating at every job. This will make...
True, I guess we are mixing concerns here a bit. And now it caused a merge conflict 😅 I suggest let's just get the conflict resolved, merge the linting, and...
Also, make the PR against the `minor` branch please 👍