Matt Luongo
Matt Luongo
@gakonst would be fun to get your take on this. No idea if we can feel good / comfortable getting this into the docs by [initial spec peer review](https://github.com/keep-network/tbtc/milestone/8) but...
We can either do this all in one PR, or split this into a doc and implementation PR- open to either
@Shadowfiend @NicholasDotSol have we gotten anywhere with this? Working to make sure we all know what "done" is for #326
If we assume the BTC supply asymptote, we can fit a TBTC balance with 3 additional decimals sub-satoshi into a `uint64`.... :grinning:
I assumed there was cool struct packing we can do.... Boo :( Do you just want to list assumptions we're relying on, or assumptions we believe we can rely on?
> actually maybe. bitshifts got in with constantinople, so this may be a thing now :o Looks like we'd have to replace the standard ERC-20 address to balance mapping to...
> I'll play around, code golf sounds fun **Narrator** It wasn't.
@gakonst this is a significant change to the state machine, and a bunch of stuff is floating still (eg the rewards for calling out undercollateralized deposits) @prestwich could use your...
> We'd also want to put active arbitrage in as a feature of an existing executable This scares me a bit... interacting with eg exchange APIs as well as people's...
> Note: fair, does not have to be 75 ETH. If the signers opted to created a Deposit that's only backed by 70 ETH, that's up to the Depositor to...