Matt Luongo
Matt Luongo
> An attacker in this case could try to empty the order book right before the expiration period, and then set an arbitrary price of their choice. I think the...
I'm taking a crack at spec'ing this as it's closely related to #293, which is blocking a couple projects we're working with from integrating cc @gakonst
We're sticking with 6 confirmations for v1. We'll consider variable difficulty based on deposit velocity in v2
Since shipping tBTC v1, the world has kept on turning. Adding @eth-r as we explore Cannetti and Gennaro '20 for tBTC v2.
Note that this is meant as a far less dangerous alternative to #14, and complementing #118. Ohter open questions * How can we do this as safely as possible? I...
Moving this to post-mainnet, as we've pushed attempts to increase ROI on bonded collateral to the next version.
Funny that we didn't review their stuff, but definitely worth calling out :man_shrugging:
> I mean, I did my homework lol, I didn't- IIRC they pinged James after we had our base design settled. But they deserve a call-out either way as this...
I like that mechanism a lot.
@gakonst itnerested in taking this one? Basically looking for an answer to the question "how expensive is it to attack the peg via double-spending deposits?".