Michał Górny

This is how we test stuff in Gentoo — at least whenever possible. We actually have a detailed writeup on this. If you don't mind me copy-pasting: > - the...

We're fetching (and mirroring) the GitHub snapshot by commit ID, making sure that the correct commit is matched to every release, e.g. for 2.34.1 we're fetching imageio/test_images@1121036015c70cdbb3015e5c5ba0aaaf7d3d6021, `https://github.com/imageio/test_images/archive/1121036015c70cdbb3015e5c5ba0aaaf7d3d6021.tar.gz`.

> Ah, so a user would be served the test images alongside the source if they choose to download the source code with portage. It sounds a bit excessive to...

Ok, I don't think it's possible to check `-m` like that using the public API, and I don't think it'd be easy even with the private API. Perhaps I could...

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't that iterate over markers that the specific test is decorated with, rather than these requested by user?

I suppose that could work. It feels kinda icky but should be good enough.

mbedtls 3.0.0 has been released 1.5 year ago. Is there any plan to support it?

While trying to figure out haptic problems I'm having, I've noticed that this patch breaks building against SDL1: ``` cfg-gtk.c:(.text+0xccf): undefined reference to `SDL_FlushEvent' ```

Actually, it turned out SDL1 is no better than SDL2 (for haptic).

The RFC has been published last month.