Mason Freed
Mason Freed
> Is there still progress here or is the topic dead? This feature is **fully shipped** on chromium browsers. The other implementers are waiting for production performance data, to help...
> @mfreed7 I think that's a mischaracterization of Mozilla's views and seems somewhat unwarranted? We've been plenty supportive of exploring declarative web components. We're just not quite convinced of declarative...
I think this sounds like a reasonable idea, and doesn't seem too hard to implement (modulo the details). I'm at least supportive enough to continue the discussion and get a...
> Let me know what details you'd need to make a decision on this and if you think this is interesting enough to prototype I'll try to open a PR...
> Hmm, maybe we should just change the syntax to `Element.setAttribute('anchor', 'someIdHere');` and the usual behavior + processing of IDREFs occurs. WDYT, @BoCupp-Microsoft? I like that approach. It cuts off...
While I agree with the core of this issue, I'm loathe to jump all the way to specifying the full HTML structure. I'm guessing implementers will balk at that, for...
Took me a while to find it, but I opened [this Chromium bug](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1171866) to discuss. See [this comment](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1171866#c1) in particular for the likely reason complex selectors won't be supported here.
> https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/9 is another really odd one as a use counter with supposedly extremely high usage (>50%), that doesn't exist and hasn't existed in the code base for a very...
+@jstenback for visibility
+@vmpstr FYI > The above is only a theory, though, and until we know what the actual root cause is, I think all use counter metrics are likely suspect. @jstenback...