Mario Casquero

Could this patch be merged? Thanks !

Tested on RHEL9.0.0, RHEL.8.6.0 and Win2019 guests. Before applying the patch: ```bash (1/3) Host_RHEL.m9.u0.ovmf.qcow2.virtio_scsi.up.virtio_net.Guest.RHEL.8.6.0.x86_64.io-github-autotest-qemu.memhp_threads.q35: STARTED (1/3) Host_RHEL.m9.u0.ovmf.qcow2.virtio_scsi.up.virtio_net.Guest.RHEL.8.6.0.x86_64.io-github-autotest-qemu.memhp_threads.q35: FAIL: QEMU threads number is not right, pre is 8, post is 9...

@yanan-fu could you review this PR? Thanks!

Refactorized the test code and extracted the functions to a provider file ```bash (1/1) Host_RHEL.m9.u2.ovmf.qcow2.virtio_scsi.up.virtio_net.Guest.RHEL.9.2.0.x86_64.io-github-autotest-qemu.virtio_mem_numa_basic.q35: STARTED (1/1) Host_RHEL.m9.u2.ovmf.qcow2.virtio_scsi.up.virtio_net.Guest.RHEL.9.2.0.x86_64.io-github-autotest-qemu.virtio_mem_numa_basic.q35: PASS (481.51 s) RESULTS : PASS 1 | ERROR 0 | FAIL...

@yanan-fu @zhenyzha could you review this PR? Thanks!

@zhenyzha @yanan-fu could you review again this PR? Thanks!

After the case modifications: ```bash (1/1) Host_RHEL.m9.u2.ovmf.qcow2.virtio_scsi.up.virtio_net.Guest.RHEL.9.2.0.x86_64.io-github-autotest-qemu.virtio_mem_numa_basic.q35: STARTED (1/1) Host_RHEL.m9.u2.ovmf.qcow2.virtio_scsi.up.virtio_net.Guest.RHEL.9.2.0.x86_64.io-github-autotest-qemu.virtio_mem_numa_basic.q35: PASS (416.22 s) RESULTS : PASS 1 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 |...

@PaulYuuu could you review again this PR? Thanks!

@yanan-fu @PaulYuuu @zhenyzha please could you review this PR again? thanks! ```bash (1/1) Host_RHEL.m9.u2.ovmf.qcow2.virtio_scsi.up.virtio_net.Guest.RHEL.9.2.0.x86_64.io-github-autotest-qemu.virtio_mem_numa_basic.q35: STARTED (1/1) Host_RHEL.m9.u2.ovmf.qcow2.virtio_scsi.up.virtio_net.Guest.RHEL.9.2.0.x86_64.io-github-autotest-qemu.virtio_mem_numa_basic.q35: PASS (375.10 s) RESULTS : PASS 1 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0...

@yanan-fu @PaulYuuu could you review this PR again? Thanks!