Mathias Brossard

I can confirm that a `pyocd erase --mass` worked for me.

I think my pull request #70 fixes this issue. Can someone else confirm that ?

I made some minor changes in [mbrossard/DAPLink:feature/stm32f072cb_hic](https://github.com/mbrossard/DAPLink/tree/feature/stm32f072cb_hic). I am thinking [7f53b71] should be squashed with your commit to avoid unnecessary additions. I am also working on STM32F072B-DISCO IO Config override...

In https://github.com/pyocd/pyOCD/issues/1222 titled "Target Detection Error" you said "Auto detection of the target does not take place.". The combination of HIC and target, we call that a board. If you...

In that case you don't need to create DAPLink boards, but you cannot expect `pyocd` to guess the target. I think that we you need is to be creating for...

I rebased on `experimental_compilers` and did some changes to support GCC. I split the K22F part into [mbrossard:feature/k22f_hic](https://github.com/mbrossard/DAPLink/tree/feature/k22f_hic), and the KW38 interfaces in [mbrossard:feature/k22f_kw38_if](https://github.com/mbrossard/DAPLink/tree/feature/k22f_kw38_if). I was able to do some...

Looking at `source/board/mkit_dk_dongle_nrf5x.c` and in particular `nrf_prerun_board_config()`, `sam3u2c_mkit_dk_dongle_nrf5x_if` uses the PB1, PB2 and PB3 pins to detect the board it is running on.

> Shouldn't https://github.com/mbrossard/DAPLink/blob/feature/stm32f072cb_hic/source/board/IO_Config_Override.h be located at source/board/**override_stm32f072b_disco**/IO_Config_Override.h ? Nice catch.

> This based on PR #805 and [mbrossard/DAPLink:feature/stm32f072cb_hic](https://github.com/mbrossard/DAPLink/tree/feature/stm32f072cb_hic), with following updates: > 1. updated with `main` branch; I just rebased [mbrossard/DAPLink:feature/stm32f072cb_hic](https://github.com/mbrossard/DAPLink/tree/feature/stm32f072cb_hic) onto `main`. Squashing the commits make it harder to...

I have always felt `lpc43xx_cgu.c` was duplicating things already done by `system_LPC43xx.c`, but when I tried to remove the former, I ended up breaking UART functionality. I have tested this...