Max Katz

@workgroupengineering this extension method would have to be added to 3.0 as well. So, it can be binary compatible. Imo, it would add more unwanted API surface to maintain.

@mattleibow update the PR, removed "in" overloads that will break VB. Current PR changes will already help with some migration, though not ideal.

@mattleibow I like your idea. Closing this PR then.

Although, wait, that kind of API changes of this PR cannot be added to 3.0, as it already has these methods :D Unless we add back overloads with SKImageFilter and...

@mattleibow can you take a look at this PR? I have tested 3.0 releases on tvOS and it worked perfectly. I didn't test 2.x branch, but expect it to be...

Possibly we can have two different implementations, one SKBitmap backed and another SKimage backed. Updating all the usage. But does it have any benefit of avoiding SKImage? I don’t expect...

It is required to recompile C# project in order to see any changes in the previewer. Extension should disable the previewer until user completes his handler method and recompiles the...

Alternatively, extension can force recompilation which isn't always a desired solution.

> Do we have any options to make that work as it does in WPF No. Well, we can inject an empty event handler into the assembly, but I feel...

There should be another warning or an error before this one.