Matt Pavlovich
Matt Pavlovich
@rmannibucau yep, I'm aware of the osgi manifest declarations. The maven bundle plugin generates those values based on the maven dependencies. Again, by staying with the JMS 1.1 requirement, we...
@rmannibucau I'm not following you at all. When would you think it is suitable to upgrade to the v2 of the JMS specification? Note-- in the patch, I set the...
@stevemuk would you please rebase and squash down to one commit? edit: tag the author
> Thats seemingly as an answer wasnt given to a question, one I dont know the answer to and so didnt answer. Care to clarify-- specifically, what action or steps...
Rebased against main post-5.17.2 release.
Feels like this PR is in good shape to merge. Please provide a final review for any blocking issues and provide path forward for the in-scope features. Thank you! @cshannon...
Sounds good. Merging this now and then will get started on the next round of features.
> to me, once this PR is merged, the only non-reproducible bits are a stupid timestamp, I'll need to chase in Spring later > > ``` > ├── META-INF/spring.handlers >...
@hboutemy would you please rebase against main and squash your commits? I'd think this would be good to get going in 5.18.x
Please rebase, and take a look at the comments about moving some clean-up tasks to finally {} blocks instead to prevent leaks or deadlock.