Results 14 issues of Matthias Kerekes

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** Since we're all spoiled with the features of today's search engines, like autocomplete and typo tolerance, I was wondering if...

new feature

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** When clicking on pictures in the HTML, they are not enlarged but downloaded. **Describe the solution you'd like** Enlarge pics...

new feature

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** Table captions have no special formatting, which can be somewhat irritating – same applies to figure captions. This results in...

new feature

Some mailtemplates at the preprintserver are hardcoded, like the one the editors get after a submission is finished ("A new preprint has been submitted to {name of the repo}: {article...

new feature
t-shirt M
dev-ready

Tables in the OLH theme are displayed with two scrollbars below, even if scrolling is not necessary. This is very useful on mobile devices, but in most cases there is...

bug
t-shirt XS
dev-ready
medium

The journal site is showing a link to the preprint server even if the item there is unpublished, see: https://www.inggrid.org/article/id/3932/ (ID 28 on the preprintserver). The link leads to a...

bug
t-shirt XS

The English language interface cannot be disabled in the language selection interface. An override is also not possible. EN is set as the base language for the install. It would...

new feature

The current phrase for preprints at ing.grid is _This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version {x} of this Preprint._ Example: https://preprints.inggrid.org/repository/view/14/ But some of...

new feature

Some editors have been asking for a better overview of editor responsibilities in the backend of preprints.inggrid.org. A Kanban view similar to the journal backend might be quite handy. Could...

new feature

Seems like editors can't assign the review again after accidentally clicking on the back-button during this process. We should make it possible to get back to the review email page....

bug