Naser Mahfouz
Naser Mahfouz
ERS_P4.ne4pg2_oQU480.F2010.singularity_gnu.eam-wcprod_F2010 You can find the logs here for the current runs: https://github.com/E3SM-Project/E3SM/actions/runs/8089448063?pr=6266 Or here for earlier today: https://github.com/E3SM-Project/E3SM/actions/runs/8089108765 (clicking on the this specific one with amazon-package-like box will download the...
FYI: repro on chrys gnu: ```shell FAIL ERS.ne4pg2_oQU480.F2010.chrysalis_gnu.eam-wcprod_F2010 (phase COMPARE_base_rest) Case dir: /lcrc/group/e3sm/ac.ngmahfouz/scratch/chrys/ERS.ne4pg2_oQU480.F2010.chrysalis_gnu.eam-wcprod_F2010.20240228_195915_gndld7 test-scheduler took 421.1206338405609 seconds ``` ``` [ac.ngmahfouz@chrlogin1 ~]$ grep FILLDIFF /lcrc/group/e3sm/ac.ngmahfouz/scratch/chrys/ERS.ne4pg2_oQU480.F2010.chrysalis_gnu.eam-wcprod_F2010.20240228_195915_gndld7/run/*cprnc.out /lcrc/group/e3sm/ac.ngmahfouz/scratch/chrys/ERS.ne4pg2_oQU480.F2010.chrysalis_gnu.eam-wcprod_F2010.20240228_195915_gndld7/run/ERS.ne4pg2_oQU480.F2010.chrysalis_gnu.eam-wcprod_F2010.20240228_195915_gndld7.elm.h0.0001-01-12-00000.nc.base.cprnc.out: FILLDIFF NFIRE ```
Feel free to do so :)
copying @rljacob --- I think we need non-jan tests in our test suites. An example, in the atmosphere (both eam and eamxx) we are often interested in runs starting say...
@bishtgautam, let's take this chance to add a testmod for this specific case?
Sounds good, let me know if I can be of any help :)
@dqwu usually, testing with gnu on any machine will yield similar results to the singularity_gnu tests. Let me know if you cannot reproduce them after your updates and I can...
I am not sure if it is good practice to be changing auto-generated code (this code is autogenerated by the chem pp). For additional context, something along these lines came...
A blocker: the new higher-dimensioned fields make it impossible to restart the model. The error is of this sort: `ERROR: set_field_dimensions: mdim size must be > 0` (the new dims...
Hi @singhbalwinder, thank you for the quick review! I have made some edits in response to your review. I also intentionally exposed the blocker to this PR in a testmod...