Marcin
Marcin
I think this will be removed as we will replace `future` with `callr` in here https://github.com/insightsengineering/teal/pull/1255
If not with #1255 then maybe with another alternative https://github.com/insightsengineering/teal/pull/1263
@donyunardi I think you can run ```r fact_vars_adsl
@averissimo looks really solid
Proposition for an improvement in here https://github.com/insightsengineering/teal/pull/1309, but blocked by https://github.com/insightsengineering/teal/issues/1298
Hey, I provided - a PR for the top part of the issue https://github.com/insightsengineering/teal/pull/1319 - a DRAFT for the second part of the issue https://github.com/insightsengineering/teal/pull/1320 (but this is blocked by...
Closed with https://github.com/insightsengineering/teal/pull/1319
It's not that bad, you can see a huge button with `Submit to run`. So even though you can click between modules, it looks like broken, but there is another...
I agree with the removal of `%>%` from the codebase, but I'm not sure we really rely on `4.1`
8 failed tests in R CMD CHECK ``` [ FAIL 8 | WARN 3 | SKIP 56 | PASS 482 ] ``` ```r Error in `testthat::test_that("e2e: validate_input validates dateRangeInput")`: argument...