Luigi Pinca

Yes, the point is that the use of primordials did not cause any performance improvement in Node.js

I don't know, I don't use TypeScript.

Yes, we need to revisit some micro optimizations once TF+I lands (8.2.0?). For example we can use `Object.create(null)` directly now instead of ```js function Storage() {} Storage.prototype = Object.create(null); ```...

Encrypted variables are not available to untrusted builds such as pull requests coming from another repository so don't worry about that. Can we find a better name? Like, I don't...

@onlywei can't this be done with something like this? ```js for (const event of ee.eventNames()) { for (const listener of ee.listeners(event)) { ee.removeListener(event, listener, context); } } ``` I understand...

It would be nice to see a benchmark. cc: @3rd-Eden

It makes sense, should the same be done for the server (--listen)?

I guess this doesn't work because `'line'` events are ignored before the WebSocket is open. To make it work with the current implementation we should probably buffer them.

What is your use case? This package has no binary dependencies.

I think it's out of the scope of the project. Maybe it can be done with https://github.com/zeit/pkg or something similiar but I have no experience with that.