Kathy Eng

I agree that there are some tables that don't have row or column headers; that periodic table is a good example. For a table with no row header, I use...

I recall discussing that there's limited tools that fit the criteria and that they typically aren't considered AT. Removing the sentence would address my comment. Not sure if there was...

will start a new PR for this and include Jenn's edit.

While it's not identical, could [Failure of Success Criterion 1.3.1 due to using structural markup in a way that does not represent relationships in the content](https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Techniques/failures/F43.html) be relevant for Fail...

Aug 4 ACT Task Force discussed and agreed: assistive technology provides different information for `menuitem` vs `treeitem` in a menuitem group, and it can be confusing for the user. RESOLUTION:...

The Editor's draft ACT Rules Format 1.1 has a [Background](https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html#background) section that includes [Other Resources](https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html#other-resources). Would "Other Resources" be a good place to include a link to the verbose examples?...

> I don't know how difficult it is to add a new section to the rules format wherever we want. We're in the process of updating the Rules Format so...

https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1458 has many examples for label in name that were discussed in a CG meeting last year(?). Sorry I can't recall a date.

> Ultimately, ACT rules make little differences between Passed and Inapplicable outcomes Yes, agree. But I think Pass Ex 5 may cause some confusion. I think this example would be...

Compiling for TF discussion: From [Understanding 2.5.3](https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/label-in-name.html): > Note that where a visible text label does not exist for a component, this Success Criterion does not apply to that component....