Keith Cirkel

[Here all all the `.with` tests](https://github.com/chaijs/chai-spies/blob/master/test/spies.js#L227-L366), some of them ([like this one](https://github.com/chaijs/chai-spies/blob/master/test/spies.js#L239)) look at the failure error message, and test what it says. You'd just need to extend these with...

Hey @ExploreMqt do you think you will have some time available to update this?

This looks great! But yes, let's get some tests in here before merging please!

Hey @ThomWright thanks for the issue. This does seem to be a problem. I'd welcome a PR to fix this if you have the time :smile:

Hey @drzaal awesome work :smile:. I've added some comments above, could you please address them?

Hey @PhilippMi thanks for the issue! Thanks @stevenhair for the extra comment. We have some plans to fix this kind of thing long term, but yeah this wont be fixed...

Hey @stevenvachon sorry I missed this one. Is this a feature request? Chai itself already has assertions for looking into arrays, for example your first example could be: ``` js...

Sorry it took so long to get to this! This looks like a good idea. @stalniy thoughts? If we do merge this, @nickcarenza - you'll need to rebase this pr...

@stalniy I'm a big fan of Promises and async/await but I think your premise that we can write callback free code is flawed. For example the event listener patten is...

How does that prove the case that we shouldn't provide a `calledBackWith` assertion?