Kristian Agasøster Haaga

I know there's at least one case in ComplexityMeasures.jl too, but I didn't check too closely beyond that

> Oh, just now I saw the wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_content > > Right, I would still stay away from self, but we can use `information_content` instead. I'm fine with whatever term...

@Datseris I'm also a bit hesitant about the name `FluctuationComplexity`. I mean: yes - it is a complexity measure in the sense that it uses entropies & friends. However, I...

This is how it will look in the paper if using `Fluctuation`. I think this is nice and clean syntax.

:( Well well, no worries. I had a quite prolific period of implementing new things just before we started reorganising the package, so there's a bit of a backlog on...

> What's the index...? I must misunderstood something because I can't imagine a scenario where the length of the indices is not the same as the length of the data....

> the only way this would be non breaking is with a wrapper function such as codify_into_outcomes that calls codify and then does the extra step. Yep, an additional function...

@rusandris Hey there! I did a bit of digging. The implementation here differs from the original implementation in step 2 of the paper. They use positive embedding lags; we use...

Looks useful, @rafaqz! From a brief glance at their [supplementary information](https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41598-021-98864-2/MediaObjects/41598_2021_98864_MOESM1_ESM.pdf), this looks pretty straight forward to implement. One parameter in their method is `T`, the fraction of pairwise distances...

> I don't expect it to be breaking. My idea here was to avoid introducing an extra transition that's not present in the symbolic time series (hence changed the default...