Joris Vaillant

Yes, I you want to build pinocchio and install it in another environment, then pixi is not tailored to your need. Maybe when `pixi build` will be available, we will...

Hello @Zionshang, #2402 had been merged. I close this issue.

> * The example with `a.hpp` and `b.hpp` seems a bit contrived since the cycle can be broken by forward-declaration of either `struct A` or `struct B` in either file...

@ManifoldFR I have changed `xxx-expl.hxx` to `xxx-inst.hxx` in the PR description. Also, `xxx-decl.hxx` have been changed to `xxx.hxx`. I will change the convention.md and the migration script later.

We can also add example-robot-data as a pinocchio build dependency. It's not possible, because right now example-robot-data depend of pinocchio. We could split this project into example-robot-data-resources (only the robots)...

I was more thinking about using example-robot-data packages and get rid of the submodule. So example-robot-data repository will be unchanged (only some CMake options would be added to select if...

Closed as doc is well displayed

Hello @emrecemal, Since Pinocchio 3.3.0, the conda package is build with SDF support.

@nim65s While stabilizing pinocchio I had some similar issues in the conda-forge build farm that have custom CXXFLAGS. Do you know if the Nix build farm have custom CXXFLAGS also...

We have to manage the following issue #508