Joseph Musser

For my part, it's only the explicit test listing that is burdensome. I like the idea of treating ignored items as a TODO list. It seems okay to keep considering...

Flags sound pretty cool. Would there be a CLI switch per flag value?

@AGBrown If you have ignored tests that *aren't* inherently a TODO, have you considered using Assert.Inconclusive (more of a N/A) instead?

I'm really looking forward to this. It'll make NUnit's own CI logs so much easier to read!

Another issue I'm having today is that AppVeyor ignores all but the first `trx` file. Perhaps this is because the tests are identically named? Right now `dotnet test`'s TRX can't...

AltCover is cool. When I run `dotnet test /p:AltCover=true` with AltCover in the test project, it outputs `coverage.netcoreapp3.1.xml` and `coverage.net5.0.xml`. (Automatically inserting each target framework before the file extension.) Why...

A thought I keep having about all of our projects is that in ~~2009~~, NUnit only supported back to .NET Framework 2.0. It didn't support .NET Framework 1.1 which was...

Good to know. I'd love if there was a way for the TRX format to be enhanced so that a single file can contain all the results for each target...

> well maybe you could use the existing feature? How would my build script know which TFMs to use? They change pretty often. This is additional pain.

@ChrisMaddock I haven't heard anything yet. Are you okay with me going ahead with this change, or should we spend more time looking at alternatives?