Jenny Messerly
Jenny Messerly
oh, we'll need v8 support though. http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/#sec-instanceofoperator
@vsmenon -- that's an illegal field override with field, right?
in other words, is this a dupe of #52
Nice. I'll dupe it as the other bug covers either fix option. I think we're leaning towards restriction first. While runtime fix is pretty easy, it has some bad implications...
good catch! I forgot if that was supposed to be supported or not :) does it work differently with public fields (I guess probably not)?
Looking at the comments, it looks like we didn't intend to support overriding fields at all, even with getter/setter. (It doesn't interact well with separate compilation. Basically has the same...
@jacob314 -- should JS interop to provide some way to go from a Type to the corresponding JS constructor function? It seems like it, IMO. @dam0vm3nt -- a workaround for...
@vsmenon @jacob314 -- thoughts on priority of this one?
(also I think Jacob's fix might address this?)