Josh Holbrook
Josh Holbrook
Likely in this case there would be no special error handling, since celery doesn't by default try to do anything smart with errors either.
RQ is a little weirder: http://python-rq.org/ ```py from pyee import RQEventEmitter # Sets a (name, BaseEventEmitter()) key/val pair in a # shared dict namespace. The worker and the # client...
Fun fact, Celery supports not just rabbit but also redis SQS and \*checks notes\* zookeeper http://docs.celeryproject.org/en/latest/getting-started/brokers/
One edge case here is what happens if a worker emits an event on its own emitter. I would hope that celery handles this - that if you call app.handler...
It would be cool if this could parse an optimist-style options object, assuming an optimist-compatible argv parser was being used.
Hey, thanks for the reply! I appreciate the background on what openMSX is doing with GLEW - and yeah, I can't say I'm surprised to hear this. The issue I...
I have quite a few features I want to experiment with and I'm totally down to send changes upstream! I'm also happy maintaining my own fork. Either way!
@kloczek I took another look at this, and I believe I no longer test those deprecated APIs. However, I noticed on closer inspection that one of the warnings is about...
I'm going to close this out, just for bookkeeping. But let me know if this is still an issue for you and we can talk about re-opening.
I've never used tags, and have no idea how they work. So, no, I didn't have plans for this.