Justin Chadwell
Justin Chadwell
Nice that we no longer get the error :tada: But also, yes, the internal details leak... not great. Not quite sure how that's happening, will have a poke around.
There was some discussion of this in discord: https://discord.com/channels/707636530424053791/1003718839739105300/1262464210823151638 Quoting @sipsma: > I don't think we can just have a single container be multiplatform. If you do a withExec then...
Hm, I'm not able to reproduce, with that version of buildx, I can easily copy a multi-architecture image (like `moby/buildkit:latest` to another repository). I think it's possible your command line...
Can you also share the results of `docker buildx imagetools inspect --raw /:` as mentioned previously?
Hm, @phab-cpr @aggo15, what registries are you using (or at least what software is hosting them)? In https://github.com/docker/buildx/pull/2013 I've added a test for these cases, and they appear to work...
> We found out that Azure Container Registry API `/v2///manifests/` is returning different result for different region. In this case, which ever instance you upload to will return the correct...
For some reason, it looks like only a single architecture is getting replicated to the US region :anguished: Note the media types. In the Asia region, we have a **manifest...
Hm, test failures are legit, digging in.
Okay, @rajatjindal merging this now. Ideally we'd also have some docs for this as well - not sure exactly where these should go, maybe into https://docs.dagger.io/api/remote-modules? It's related to the...
Elixir tests look to be failing.