Julien Couvreur
Julien Couvreur
@mcintyre321 Can you expand on your scenario? Why not just do `class SomeCommand : Command ...`?
Feature was merged into 17.3p2
When we look at this we should also look at allowing built-in types, e.g. `using UserId = int;`
Yes, the spec is still only a draft PR for now. The link will work by next week.
@walczakb That was a typo. Thanks for spotting. Fixed
Moved to C# 11 milestone as this change was done in 17.4 (PR https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/64186)
@jaredpar I'll add some instrumentation to get crash dumps when this occurs ([PR](https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/60585)). Any other ideas for what we should do?
Failed in https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_build/results?buildId=1778744&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab&runId=47702738&resultId=161045&paneView=debug
> Current single test for all declarations is getting really enormous and hard to navigate in Agreed. Adding method/test boundaries won't cause that much churn, so should be fine especially...
@DoctorKrolic Indeed, that had fallen off my radar (we have many open PRs at the moment). Thanks for the ping. Looks good, thanks!