Jae Kwon

> In such cases, it is the delegators, not the validators, who bear the brunt of any loss in value. and the validators could have no self-delegation at all... >...

> To reduce risks in the chain, imposing a cap on the amount of bonded tokens held by a single validator might be effective. For example, limiting a validator to...

Yes and if we just have the right dashboard it should be good to incentivize world-wide decentralization and participation. The stakers can choose for themselves, or else risk a split...

> A validator whose self bonded to delegated ratio is below a preset min parameter received less rewards A minimum self-bond ratio will create a marketplace of loans where stakers...

Since you can't delete a NaN key I presume, couldn't we solve this with minimal changes? There's already a List, so the insertion order is what would make it deterministic?...

> ```diff > // If NaN, instead of computing map key, just append to List. > ``` Thanks, that makes sense. Having ComputeMapKey return a second bool isn't bad, see...

I'd rather have the TODOs in the readme, though I like your organization strategy. This way while we develop the "whitepaper" anyone who prints it can already see what is...

Yeah let's move everything from tendermint/atom-one that is relevant, to this repo. Also I think the Decentralists DAO governance suggestions, should be incorporated too either in the constitution or a...

Great. What there is so far: > We believe that by **embracing diversity** and **fostering open dialogue** between > **competing self-aligned groups** we can create a more robust, innovative, and...

It isn't welcoming to everyone. I don't think we should be, the purpose is to get away from unaligned people who are not insignificant in number. Lawyers have a bar,...