Jae Kwon

Thank you for your feedback. This feedback is good, we can do surveys but we do need validation for this to work. I agree with 82. Maybe we make it...

Besides framing all of this in terms of rewards rather than slashing, which I think is great overall because (a) it legitimately is arguably an incentive because the vote is...

Never-voters: if they never voted, well, did they delegate to a validator? Then that should be sufficient if for example they fully trust the validator, or are trying to support...

At the risk of getting people upset because of uncertainty, I'll stake an initial try at this. 1. Everything is phrase as a reward. This keeps it positive (and since...

> The goal would be to distribute "skin in the game" more evenly I can't agree with this because it just incentivizes people who split their wallets using programs. Everything...

> So I suggest for sub 5,000 Atom stakeholders some kind of multilpliers that the distribution would be more equal This is game-able, so we cannot make such a modification,...

> @MichaelFrazzy I kind of like the idea from @discoverdefiteam where you redistribute the amount you slash from yes-voters to others, and this way you can pretty much do this...

> Don't you think you're overcomplicating things with these ratios and percentages and stuff? > People made a choice by voting. > Those who didn’t vote are not interested. >...

wow how should we do this? do you want to maintain a README__CIS.md file? are you using a translation tool? I'd say we aren't quite ready for translations of all...

This is fine, but how about we keep the old transpile_gno0p9 code (and the old cmd/tool_fix) and mark it as deprecated? The reason is because a lot of work went...