Jae Kwon
Jae Kwon
> Adopt Decentralists DAO governance suggestions Yes I think we should copy over the governance suggestions into this repo, basically migrate it here for now. > proposals could be "tagged"...
I'm going to start updating this comment here as I read. (in case I repeat something already discussed I will delete it) > Interesting, but complicated to achieve fairly without...
> > the AtomOne hub offers a trade that makes $phATOM deflationary: `non-atom rewards nor taxes are applied` to auto-staked $ATOM1 bonded $phATOM holders, and with the right conversion equation...
> we haven't seen liquid staking play out in environments where tx fees exceed inflation We need to design the constitution with this in mind; it must work from bootstrapping...
> 2\. If we legittimate Decentralist we will have : We won't, except in a restricted form. AtomOne is strictly owned by the $ATOM1 stakers, and probably not at all...
> @giunatale * This second formula I assume would not change even in our case. It's the other way around because going from PHOTON back to ATOM1 is potentially dangerous...
Reading...
> I am of the idea that it should be a bid to the lowest amount of $ATOM1s-per-$PHOTON bidders are willing to take per round I like this too. "Curves"...
> However if I think if we are as imminent as I'm led to believe... at this point using DAODAO is honestly the "scenic route", and we are late. We...
Yeah AiB should invest in an AtomOne team, and also encourage others to join to make this a decentralized development ecosystem. But we want AtomOne to work with more external...