Ivan Ka

Results 538 comments of Ivan Ka

By any chance could you as well share results of a smoke tests, need to make sure the feature is actually working

From the implemenentation no question. Looks ok. But there are concerns around actual feature itself related but there is a problem on how certain things where implemented. 1. https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/external-dns/issues/4566 2....

I might missing or, not clear from flags itself. What if I don't want this behaviour in my current setup? Will it work as is if I'm not adding any...

It would be nice to have cloud agnostic storage support. Many providers enforce API limits for various reasons, which restricts the number of records we can add, update, or delete....

This could also help standardise the registry interface, and we should explore options to support additional registries as add-ons, similar to how webhooks are implemented for providers.

Found this half-done pull request https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/external-dns/pull/4598 Very relevant

Noop registry is tricky, mainly for providers not supporting mechanisms to track ownership.

For SREs, dealing with an issue like this is a headache, especially when the service is in a `crashloopbackoff` state due to a user supplying a poison pill. The SIGSEGV...

I wrongly assumed. You are right, should fix current problem.