Ivan Ruiz Manuel

Actually, the issue is much, much worse: Obsidian seems to actively delete any comment text in the properties section if you add a new property or modify it. This means...

@heejaechang got it. Perhaps it would be good to specify this lacking feature in the `READ.me` or the documentation more clearly? I think the reason why issues on this topic...

Correct. Here, `parse_lombadi` is on the same directory as the script calling it. 

@mrtcode This is an awesome feature and will be very much appreciated! Just two things: 1. It would be nice if we could modify the alpha to accommodate people with...

Another example: This one fails. Removing the header fixes the issue. Interestingly, the behavior changes depending on whether or not you are using a debugger. ```csv nodes,techs,parameters,values NORD,ccgt,initial_flow_cap,20000000 NORD,hydropower,initial_flow_cap,11191600 NORD,wind,initial_flow_cap,115600...

> I can only reproduce this issue with your second example. The first one loads just fine. Odd, that's the one I saw as most problematic. I'll give an update...

Hmmm, that is true... The only way to make it possible would be to force one type of table (i.e. rows only), which would make the input very inflexible).

@timtroendle I believe the preferred naming in Calliope 0.7 is nodes. So perhaps we should use that? See: https://calliope.readthedocs.io/en/latest/math/base/

How about `shapes`? It's shorter than `geometries` / `spatial_units`, avoids confusion with other model functions, and is a bit clearer than `zones` (imo). - national_shapes - regional_shapes - continental_shapes -...

Closed since a new version of this feature was created by @tud-mchen6