Ian
Ian
Is that with the dev version or the experimental link above ? Just testing in Chrome it seems to behave, but I notice in Opera there is an issue. Which...
Ah nope, did it in Chrome as well, maybe best to leave the experimental one (if thats the one you are using), as I wasn't so confident some bugs wouldn't...
I think the problem is that the bounding box is calculated for the rotated element, and then it's also rotated. Not a quick fix, and conflicts with some of the...
I think for the moment, I'm going to leave it as it is on dev. That at least is consistent. I think one of the issues, is that there are...
What are you wanting it to do different compared to updateHandles() ?
Ah ok, it does that for me if I'm understanding right, eg http://svg.dabbles.info/fttestnew/test2.html ? (doubleclick elements)
Hiya, looks like that got missed out, I think because the original conversion didn't have it in, so has never been part of it to try and get working.
Just out if interest, what's the main desire for the boundary....is it to keep the element with a limited area, or a dragger, or the center of an element within...
I think this is probably more complicated to do a decent solution than it sounds... For example, suppose it's a rotated set of rects. Then we scale it by 2...what...
I guess you can change the code to swap latlngs to a list of 2 doubles or something. On Saturday, December 18, 2021, Anwar ***@***.***> wrote: > Hi, I interested...