Joshua Haberman

We rely on users to contribute fixes to system-specific problems like this. We have many users across many different systems. We don't have the bandwidth or the background to drive...

Brent, we'd love to take advantage of the new PHP feature. We'd have to stage the change to allow for a migration, possibly using editions: https://protobuf.dev/editions/overview/ If you could write...

I'm unassigning myself from this issue because I'm not working on it myself. But https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/pull/14981 will fix this issue if/when it is submitted.

I think this makes sense to do. We would welcome a contribution. An easy start would be: - Extend `DescriptorPool#lookup` to allow looking up services/methods by fully-qualified name - Implement...

I'm unassigning myself as I have no immediate plans to work on this, but we would welcome a contribution.

This change indeed made the cut for 27.x, and is announced in the release notes for 27.0-rc1: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/releases/tag/v27.0-rc1

I think PHP support for custom options should be achievable within the next six months. upb (the C library underlying PHP's extension) will soon be getting support for extensions, which...

Custom options are supported in the "upb" C library that underlies that PECL extension, so all external blockers are removed. But there are several things that would need to be...

To use `readonly` I think we'd need to have separate types. For example, given a message `Foo`, we currently generated a PHP class `Foo`. Would we also need to generate...

Hi @davido, I can share some thoughts from the perspective of someone on the proto team. We agree with the premise that most users have no need to build `protoc`...