Gunar Schorcht

@kaspar030 This PR requires an update of CI workers. Is there a plan when it is done next time? How is it coordinated?

@benpicco Do you think the CI workers are updated now?

> Well it's worth a try. And with the current CI run times the compilation will happen during the night anyway. > > If not we got something to point...

> > Well it's worth a try. And with the current CI run times the compilation will happen during the night anyway. > > If not we got something to...

> CI is not happy anymore > > ``` > undefined reference to `cpu_coreclk' > ``` :worried: Hm, I compiled some tests before pushing the changes. That is, we need...

> > CI is not happy anymore > > ``` > > undefined reference to `cpu_coreclk' > > ``` > > worried Hm, I compiled some tests before pushing the...

@benpicco I am getting desperate as I am getting another unrelated error in the CI compilation. I was hoping to merge the PR today to be able to provide the...

Thanks for reviewing and merging.

@maribu Sorry for jumping into this discussion so late. To be honest, I would prefer to drop the changes for ESPs for now, as they conflict with PRs #17842, #17844,...

> OK, let's put this on hold until #17842 and #17844 are in. @maribu The changes of these PRs are merged now but there are a number of new PRs...